User talk:JayCubby

File:Crowd panicking after the 205 New Orleans truck attack.webm

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Crowd panicking after the 2025 New Orleans truck attack.webm has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crowd panicking after the 2025 New Orleans tr…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Battlesnake1 (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JayCubby

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:First million digits of e.pdf

And also:

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:PSA Airlines flight 5342 crash.webm

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:PSA Airlines flight 5342 crash.webm has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:PSA Airlines flight 5342 crash.webm

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 04:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Col Charles Lindbergh.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Actually, since this one is in use, I split the upload history: File:Col Charles Lindbergh, original, hec.21329.jpg. Best, Yann (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:A russian Kh-22 missile struck near a village road in the Lipetsk region, russia. Caught on a dashcam..webm

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:A russian Kh-22 missile struck near a village road in the Lipetsk region, russia. Caught on a dashcam..webm has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:A russian Kh-22 missile struck near a village…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kaliper1 (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Reagan National Airport mid air collision CCTV.webm

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Reagan National Airport mid air collision CCTV.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ahecht.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:CenturyLink Field in soccer configuration from Stadium Place.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Were you still planning to overwrite this file? It is no longer protected and should be good to go. Sounder Bruce 19:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@SounderBruce, thanks for the reminder. The fixed version is at https://ibb.co/pvCDkDBy

If that doesn't work, I can try a different file host. JayCubby (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:1907 Ultra High Relief $20 Double Eagle (Inverted Edge Letters).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1907 Ultra High Relief $20 Double Eagle (Inverted Edge Letters).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your DR nomination of a completely free file

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, do you know about Commons:Multi-licensing? Юрий Д.К 05:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Igor Kirillov scoooter bomb video.webm

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Igor Kirillov scoooter bomb video.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Drakosh (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Campus photograph in Trivandrum.jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Campus photograph in Trivandrum.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Campus photograph in Trivandrum.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Consigned (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:La.Vie.de.Mahomet Christies.jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:La.Vie.de.Mahomet Christies.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: reason)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 108.18.103.204.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from Tullio Saba

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 04:10, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:President Harding and Calvin Coolidge.webm

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:President Harding and Calvin Coolidge.webm

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:President Harding and Calvin Coolidge.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Edited versions

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Thanks for making the edits on File:Devout, Yemen (9849350914).jpg. I've fixed the cross links between it and the new File:Devout, Yemen (9849350914) (deJPG).jpg. Please take a look at both and you'll see how to link different versions of files. Also the new version was not uploaded from Flickr, so that tag shouldn't be on it. Instead use the source link to the original file here on Commons. --Cart (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

Latest comment: 9 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Olympus_Tough_TG-6.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Surrender of Japan - USS Missouri (restored).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Surrender of Japan - USS Missouri (restored).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

JPG & TIF

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

JPG and TIF versions of the same files (fairly common for LOC and other older US Gov works) are not generally considered "duplicates" to be deleted; they should be linked to each other as "other version" field. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Infrogmation, ordinarily I'd be inclined to agree, but File:ColoredSailersRoomWWINOLA.jpg is far lower-resolution. NARA provides full-resolution JPEGs, but this is simply a needlessly scaled-down version. JayCubby (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, note that LOC has been gradually uploading more and higher res versions of old photos to their website. Versions uploaded more than a decade ago were often the highest res publicly available at the time uploaded. If better versions are now available and the old version is in use, overwriting with higher res of same is often a good solution. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Emmett Till

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@JayCubby - According to the Commons description, the photo below of Emmett Till's parents was "named by Time magazine in 2016 as one of the 100 most influential photos of all time." Is it possible and worth you restoring and submitting for FP? (I don't have the tools/skills to restore.) - ERcheck (talk) 05:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@ERcheck, the highest-resolution version I could find is this. Your thoughts? The image you suggested doesn't really need restoration, too. JayCubby (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what needs to be done. Any corrections/enhancements? I don't know that the quality is sufficient for FP (I'm relatively new to the FP process), but it is truly historical. - ERcheck (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

One of Time magazine's most influential photos

Your duplicate suggestions

Latest comment: 9 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello @JayCubby

Perhaps you've sometimes wondered why I reject the requests. The images are mostly from a time when there were no better versions of them, like the Gandhi image from just now. Such images shouldn't be deleted on Commons, but rather tagged with "other version." Nevertheless, I think your version is better; I'd be happy to replace it in the different language versions for you. Regards: זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:36, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ziv, fair point. Would you like me to put future CommonsDelinker requests on your talk page? JayCubby (talk) 17:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Did you made one for these? זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ziv: {{universal replace|old image=Nehru gandhi.jpg|new image=Nehru Ghandi AP 18050506381948 (cropped).jpg|reason=Higher resolution version that hasn't been altered.}}. JayCubby (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done, I exchange files without Delinker.זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:JFK Motorcade GettyImages-517330536.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:JFK Motorcade GettyImages-517330536.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:AI-171 crash CCTV.webm

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:AI-171 crash CCTV.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Clearly hand-held, not CCTV

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Air India Flight 171 CCTV.webm

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Air India Flight 171 CCTV.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Clearly hand-held, not CCTV

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Pigsonthewing, kindly convert to regular DR. Both of these are phone cameras filming a monitor, indicating CCTV. It's not clear-cut, so a DR may be warranted. JayCubby (talk) 15:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Tp 79 at F 8 Barkarby HQ.jpg

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tail cut off? Maybe you want to replace with: https://popularhistoria.se/krig/kalla-kriget/svensk-signalspaning-pa-gransen or direct link https://images-bonnier.imgix.net/files/phi/production/2023/05/12105601/dc-3_tp79_barkaby_1951_a-1lMXiakiW44hSG-SEKF_5Q.jpg?auto=compress,format&w=960

Greetings, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 19:55, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ziv, good catch, thanks! It appears I got distracted by the regular noise and forgot to check for (meaningful) differences between the images. Re-uploaded. JayCubby (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Air India 171 runway CCTV.webm

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Air India 171 runway CCTV.webm has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Air India 171 runway CCTV.webm

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Renerpho (talk) 07:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Explosions in different areas of Tehran following Israeli attack Mizan 13 June 30.jpg

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Explosions in different areas of Tehran following Israeli attack Mizan 13 June 30.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Explosions in different areas of Tehran follo…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

184.75.207.138 15:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rosa Parks DR

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Thanks for contributing, but I think you got faked out by a line break. Please reposition your recent vote in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Rosa Parks in 1955 to a better place on the page. You have split text and signature. It should probably go to the bottom of the page. Glrx (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Glrx: interesting. Maybe ReplyTool goofed? JayCubby (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Autopatroller

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I gave you the Autopatroller right. I don't think your edits need to be patrolled. Thanks for your contributions, Yann (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, Yann. JayCubby (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Other maps

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, because of your involvement with the nomination for File:India, by British Information Services, 1944 restored version.jpg, I wondered if you are aware that this appears to be one of a series by MacDonald Gill? The file will fit in rather nicely at Category:Maps by MacDonald Gill. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:59, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe, good idea . Looking into the others now. JayCubby (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:India, by British Information Services, 1944 restored version.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:India, by British Information Services, 1944 restored version.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Devout, Yemen (9849350914) (deJPG).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Devout, Yemen (9849350914) (deJPG).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Episode after Battle of Zonnebeke 1918 Hurley restoration.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Episode after Battle of Zonnebeke 1918 Hurley restoration.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

COM:AN/U

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User stalking my uploads. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Sev6nWiki (talk) 16:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Sev6nWiki ,I was already notified. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Apollo images

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Please check what I upload to avoid duplicates. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Yann, will do. Thanks. JayCubby (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Retouched photos

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As a word of encouragement, can I just say your photo restorations are really amazing! Thank you for your efforts on these, it’s great work. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 14:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Chris.sherlock2, thanks for the message and email. JayCubby (talk) 14:23, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked

Latest comment: 7 months ago8 comments3 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 3 days. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

A.Savin 17:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@A.Savin, would you say that you are involved in the dispute? JayCubby (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

How do you mean that involved? As said, some of the RfD's were justified, while some others were not. But the fact that you were targeting Andy is obvious, because, otherwise you surely would have nominated images with more care and there were no nonsensical rquests like this one --A.Savin 20:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@A.Savin, I would not call that nonsensical. My nominations may not have been perfect in all cases, but that is no reason for a block. If you look in my deletion request history, I have a slightly different view, which I'm working to correct, of what is considered DM. I have never been sanctioned for deletion request that fails, because there is at least valid reasoning behind each one.

By involved,

"I myself am being stalked by 1989 and Christian Ferrer, so I know very well what it is about"

Is the relevant quote. You are actively involved in a dispute which you consider similar, and may not be in a place to assess potentially similar cases.

yes, I was targeting andy. I was doing so in the sense that I was going over his uploads. I was not stalking him, nor was I intending to harass it. JayCubby (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

It means then, my "involvement" is limited to the fact that I know how it feels if someone is monitoring your edits in order to do something against you, while most other admins actually don't know what it is (and as a result, we have what we have). So I think with 3 days it's a very mild sanction and I have chosen that deliberately, given the fact that some RfD's are ~in order --A.Savin 21:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@A.Savin, your involvement is more than past experience. You have made extensive, and are currently making them, in a thread pertaining to stalking.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#c-A.Savin-20250726092800-User:1989

considering that a user has already complained about my block, and that there have been substantial complaints about your previous actions, to the point where there's a UCOC case, are all good signs that this block should not have been made at all. JayCubby (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "the blocking administrator is involved in a superficially similar dispute, resulting in effectively an involved block. Multiple users have said that my actions (reviewing a user's files) do not constitute harassment. Making reasonable deletion requests is not a blockable offense. JayCubby (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)"Reply

Decline reason: "You correctly said: "Making reasonable deletion requests is not a blockable offense". As big part of you DR-s were not reasonable, I consider short block acceptable to avoid disruption. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2025 (UTC)"Reply

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ Simple English ∙ svenska ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

File:Bewegungsstudie (Movement Study) 1925, black and white photograph by Rudolf Koppitz.jpg

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Yes, the original is compressed, but the scanned resolution is also not very high. Yann (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Ford Model T and VW type 11 Luxus, Technisches Museum Wien, Juni 2009.jpg

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please use another file name, for example "Ford Model T and VW type 11 Luxus, Technisches Museum Wien, Juni 2009 (crop).jpg" with the original file descriptions for you version(s) of the file. Do not overwrite the original! --Tsui (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Self-portrait of Nadar.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Self-portrait of Nadar.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.svg

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.svg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of Th…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

AssanEcho (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Valley of the shadow of death.png

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I did more restoration, and I also adjusted the colors and the contrast. I could do more, but I have to go now. Yann (talk) 12:02, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:MagnoliaBlossom1925.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MagnoliaBlossom1925.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Valley of the shadow of death.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valley of the shadow of death.jpg 2 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The fast express LCCN2013648289.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The fast express LCCN2013648289.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at 11 October 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Birmingham Quran manuscript full.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Birmingham Quran manuscript full.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Adding context to an LOC image

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You can add context to LOC images at the LOC page at Flickr Commons. They would add 50 images each Friday from the Bain Collection, but a new guy is in charge and they add images less frequently and concentrating on later images. https://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/albums/72157603624867509/page283 RAN (talk) 03:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), I've developed (okay, ChatGPT developed with my prompting) a tool which converts info from the LOC API into wikitext. Try it at https://jaycubby-enwiki.github.io/loc-to-commons/ JayCubby (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Marcus Whitman, ca. 1895 - DPLA - aa6b0038ac3c27c768095c16dff49db1 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

How is this in any sense "by" you? - Jmabel ! talk 12:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel, Category:Files by JayCubby is just a tracking category for files I've uploaded. JayCubby (talk) 17:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

So why was it added to a file I uploaded? - Jmabel ! talk 20:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel, good question. I forgot to actually overwrite the file with slight retouching. It's done now. JayCubby (talk) 20:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Clinton and jiang-1.jpg

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Clinton and jiang-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo credited to Reuters

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://asia.nikkei.com/spotlight/comment/jiang-zemin-s-leadership-forged-by-struggle-and-pride

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Howardcorn33 (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Imperial Sand Dunes2C Southeastern California LCCN2013630449.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imperial Sand Dunes2C Southeastern California LCCN2013630449.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chart of Electromagnetic Radiations.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chart of Electromagnetic Radiations.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 514872400.jpg

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 514872400.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 5148724…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bonnie and Clyde Joplin photos

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow.jpg

And also:

File:BonnieParkerCigar1933.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, You voted Delete above, and Keep here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 514872400.jpg. However the copyright status is the same for all pictures. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Yann, thank you for the reminder.

Done. JayCubby (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 514872400.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bonnie and Clyde fooling around Getty 514872400.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.webm

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for uploading a new version of File:Sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.webm. However, by setting the framerate to 30 fps, it no longer progresses at 1 day of simulation per second of animation. Can you please set the framerate to 12 FPS (the resulting video should be around 6m08s) but use the AV1 codec instead of VP9? Thanks, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 21:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Cmglee,

Done. The command I used was

-i spillum10deg20261080p30.mp4 -c:v libaom-av1 -crf 30 -b:v 0 -cpu-used 4 -filter:v setpts=(30/12)*PTS -c:a copy spillum10deg20261080p30_12fps.webm

.

To overwrite the file, I used User:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js. I can upload files upto 5gb with it. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Looks great, thanks. I'd used

ffmpeg -y -i sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.mp4 -vf "setpts=2.5*PTS" -r 12 -c:v libvpx-vp9 -crf 37 sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.webm

but when I replaced libvpx-vp9 with libaom-av1 in the command above, I got Overriding packet duration by frame rate, this should not happen errors.

Glad to know bigChunkedUpload.js lets one upload files larger than 100 MB. Thanks, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 02:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Overwriting files

Latest comment: 4 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hello @JayCubby

Please make yourself more familiar with COM:OW. Old files like File:In The Barley Harvest.jpg, File:Ingrid bergman.jpg, File:Impetuous Charge of the First Colored Rebel Regiment (November 5, 1864), by Frank Bellew.jpg, File:General Humphrey charging Alfred Waud.jpg, and File:Confederate cavalry 1st virginia bw.jpg (and maybe more??) should not be overwritten with newer versions that differ significantly from the previous image. Please upload such files as new versions and tag the old ones with the new versions under "other versions." If you need help replacing files in language versions with your better ones, I'd be happy to assist. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:23, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Same for here please File:Nixon Contact Sheet WHPO-E0416 Colin Powell.jpg. Btw, they are all good images. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:40, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

and here File:Capture of a Arab slave dhow by H. M. S. 'Penguin' off the Gulf of Aden - ILN 1867.jpg, thanks. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

One more thing, but this is just my personal opinion. You're welcome to use the "Category:Files by JayCubby" for files where you were the original uploader, but for files that weren't originally uploaded by you and to which you've only made improvements, I find this category rather strange, even annoying, because it gives a false impression. This doesn't mean your improvements aren't appreciated. In my opinion, you should split the category into Category:Files uploaded by JayCubby and Category:Files improved by JayCubby and have the existing category deleted. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 07:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Addendum: Files by JayCubby don't need to be deleted, of course; if you follow my suggestion, I could simply rename the category for you and you just have to create the other one. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 07:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ziv, I won't contest every overwrite, but, in many cases the Library of Congress publishes higher-res versions of photos. The scanner at File:Confederate_cavalry_1st_virginia_bw.jpg was probably top-of-the-line in the nineties. I've begun to split off files. JayCubby (talk) 15:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello JayCubby. Of course they do that, but such changes should ideally be made as a new file. This way you're on the safe side, which no one will dispute, and the old version remains available on Commons, even if the file is subsequently replaced in the language versions. Thank you for your efforts. Look at it this way: your "Files uploaded by JayCubby" category would then contain more files. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 16:03, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

All or nothing

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear JayCubby, If you take one, please take all. Don't just leave the difficult ones for others. All or nothing. And yeah, thanks for your work. Vysotsky (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Avalanche of snow across railroad tracks in Alaska.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avalanche of snow across railroad tracks in Alaska.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Dash cam footage

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Igor Kirillov scooter bomb video.webm

Valued image promotion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doris Day.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- Gower (talk) 11:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mongkut, first king of Siam in state robes – cropped and restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mongkut, first king of Siam in state robes – cropped and restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

{{VICpromoted|DorisDay-midnightlace-full.jpg|Doris Day|review=* Support An improvement on its predecessor in every meaningful way. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Best in Scope, per ReneeWrites. --Gower (talk) 06:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Day-midnightlace.jpg 0
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/DorisDay-midnightlace-full.jpg +2
=>
1. File:Day-midnightlace.jpg :

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Cerano d'Intelvi - Eremo di San Zeno - 2025-09-03 16-07-48 001.jpg

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You should have a pixel peep at this one. I did. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Charlesjsharp, indeed, and I should have paid more attention. I've changed my !vote. Much appreciated. JayCubby (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

hot pixels

Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Jay...

(poor English) I saw your comment about ‘hot pixels’ on FPc. I found out what it is and realised that it's something that often happens in my photos (for example, in File:2025 Escultura na fachada do Obradoiro. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, although there are worse ones). Is there a solution? Should I throw the camera away? Lmbuga (talk) 03:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Although I know something about photography, I know very little. I should know more, but I don't. Whatever the case, thank you. Lmbuga (talk) 03:52, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure Lmbuga (talk) 04:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Lmbuga, absolutely do not throw the camera away! See this guide

Your camera's manual [en Español] details this on pagina 463. JayCubby (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. --Lmbuga (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 3 months ago9 comments3 people in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Unidentified Civil War veteran and unidentified World War I soldier) - Schriever, Scranton, Pa LCCN2017659668 (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Unidentified Civil War veteran and unidentified World War I soldier) - Schriever, Scranton, Pa LCCN2017659668 (cropped).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Looking at the picture of the Civil War veteran, the "medal" is not just any medal but the Medal of Honor.

That suggests he is one of 1522 individuals: en:List of American Civil War Medal of Honor recipients. That list would be reduced to those who survived to at least 1914.

Glrx (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Glrx, this is extremely helpful. I think it could be one of three people, within Pennsylvania at least:

David Lafayette Smith

Joel H. Lyman

Lewis A. Rounds

I can't find GAR records sorted by death date, but I'll continue to poke around. Any source suggestions would be helpful.

Thank you! JayCubby (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The soldier's cap should tell us more, but I do not know how to interpret it. Looks like a 2 and an 18 or 181.... It may identify a regiment. Glrx (talk) 20:09, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Glrx, I am fairly sure it's Patrick DeLacey! (FindAGrave) [far left]. JayCubby (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Glrx, the LoC got back to me:

Thank you for suggesting this update to our catalog record. I and a few other people took a look and while there is definitely a similarity between the man in our photo and Patrick DeLacey we don't believe they are the same man. The first reason is the man in our photo has a hat with the number 218. A veteran's hat number could correspond with the unit he was in or with the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Post he was a member of after the war. Patrick DeLacey was in the 143rd PA Infantry and the GAR did not have a 218th Post in Pennsylvania.

The man in our photo is not wearing a Medal of Honor, he's wearing the GAR medal, which looked very similar. A photo of both medals side by side can be found at https://npsgnmp.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/moh-and-gar-medals.jpg. We also think there's enough difference in the faces, especially since some of the photos of DeLacey online appear to have been taken only a few years before ours would have been.

Let us know if you have any other potential identifications. Ideally we would like all of our photos identified, but we don't want to put an incorrect identification on our catalog since our photos are used in many books and web pages.

JayCubby (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for following up on this topic. I'm sorry I misidentified the medal, but I'm also surprised that they look so similar. Glrx (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maybe there was a GAR Post 218 in PA: https://www.garrecords.org/garcat/garcatalog.htm Glrx (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Glrx, held by a Chap. T. D. Swartz. JayCubby (talk) 02:03, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Santa Claus LCCN95504975.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Claus LCCN95504975.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Arizona. Grand Canyon, photographer suspended on climber's rope LCCN2012648368.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arizona. Grand Canyon, photographer suspended on climber's rope LCCN2012648368.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Reclining man looming over New York City subway station LCCN2017645506.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reclining man looming over New York City subway station LCCN2017645506.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

AI on FMC

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New things calls for new guidelines and rules. Should AI-generated media be allowed on Featured media candidates? Share your thoughts and/or vote on Commons talk:Featured media candidates#AI-generated content. You are being asked since you vote on that project. Thank you, --Cart (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026!

-- Radomianin (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Marie Brose Tepe carte de visite LCCN 2021630920.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marie Brose Tepe carte de visite LCCN 2021630920.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴
	Merry Christmas and a happy new year! ✴ Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

- The same to you, Aristeas! JayCubby (talk) 17:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2026!

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

✨ Happy Holidays
JayCubby!
🎄 Merry Christmas!
🎉 Best wishes for 2026!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays!

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Happy New Year and Merry Christmas Jaycubby! Thank you so much for your comments and support. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 be even

better for you! JayCubby (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

heylenny (^talk/_edits) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Warm greetings from Rio Grande do Sul! heylenny (^talk/_edits) 02:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Heylenny, the same to you! JayCubby (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

* Happy Holidays! *

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком!
Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:29, 23 December 2025 (UTC) Reply

File:2005. Necesidade de atención dun neno galego. Galicia (Spain).jpg

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I apologize if I'm sometimes a bit impersonal. I appreciate your attention and efforts. I look forward to your company. Lmbuga (talk) 02:44, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

My words in Galician (or in Spanish, since Galician is similar to Spanish, but more so to Portuguese) were emotional. Very emotional. The English translation removes that emotion.--Lmbuga (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FYI @Lmbuga, I wouldn't say you are being impersonal. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Absurdly large PNG.png

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Absurdly large PNG.png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Absurdly large PNG.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 01:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Alexander Graham Bell 1895 NPG 77 363.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alexander Graham Bell 1895 NPG 77 363.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aldrich Ames photo

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:Ames yearbook58 cropped.jpg - what exactly are you trying to do here? It's your responsibility when you edit an image, especially an image you didn't upload originally, to explain what is going on. Your edit summary was the supremely unhelpful "c:User:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js: fft", and your picture looks identical except it's larger. If you can't be bothered to collaborate, that's fine, but then don't edit other photos. Since you are insisting on this with edit summaryless reverts - what, exactly, did you change here and why do you think your picture is better? Information that could have been in your original upload summary? SnowFire (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@SnowFire, see my last revert summary: "Reverted to version as of 01:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC) SnowFire, FFT means w:Fast Fourier Transform, which removed halftone artifacts :)".Reply

Perhaps there is a caching issue preventing the latest revision from showing up? JayCubby (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

On your second edit summary: Huh, my apologies. I did see your revert but the explanation was after the undo text and apparently my eyes treated it as a runon with the automatic text. I do think your first edit summary could have been more descriptive, but the second one was my bad.

That said, I still don't really see an improvement here. To be clear I could see that the image was different, just not meaningfully different or better. I'll leave it be but while I can see some subtle shading differences, it's not clearly "better" to my eyes, and the image size has increased. SnowFire (talk) 08:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Indian Mutiny Map Showing Position of Troops on 1st May 1857.jpg

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, the upload you made for File:Indian Mutiny Map Showing Position of Troops on 1st May 1857.jpg isn't quite the same map, it is missing several regional and country names. Hohum (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Hohum, good catch, reverted. I compared the two images prior to upload, but apparently not deeply enough (the region I checked was identical). JayCubby (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Woman kneeling next to bed of child, in an underground tunnel during the bombing of London during World War II.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Woman kneeling next to bed of child, in an underground tunnel during the bombing of London during World War II.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bob Dylan

Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Thanks for buying and uploading this. I think you should also scan the back, and upload it. Here is the XCF: File:Bob Dylan 1963 promo photo by Don Hunstein.xcf. Best, Yann (talk) 14:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The back is completely blank, but I will do so. Many thanks for the quick reply! JayCubby (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to ping you twice. In case I can't get the XCF to work (Photoshop is picky and conversion is unreliable), could you export as TIFF or PNG with no contrast adjustments (or better yet, could you export as a PSD)? A file host like https://litterbox.catbox.moe/ works well for large Commons incompatible files. JayCubby (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Here it is File:Bob Dylan 1963 promo photo by Don Hunstein.png. Yann (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks! JayCubby (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Other potential FPs

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I have looked at your uploads, and I notice that you have uploaded a lot of potential FPs, here and on English WP. Do you want to nominate them, or should I do?

File:The Band (1969).png (should be JPEG)
File:Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen (1888-1900), 88374 p.jpg (with a crop at the bottom)
File:Frederik de Klerk with Nelson Mandela - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 1992.jpg
File:Washington, D.C. View across Chain Bridge over the Potomac LOC cwpb.04113.jpg

Yann, feel free to nominate any of them! In cases where I restored an image intensively, I have its PSD (though I only recently started using adjustment layers). JayCubby (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks a lot! One done: en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Frederik de Klerk and Nelson Mandela. Yann (talk) 11:07, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fidel Castro in 1959

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fidel Castro (c. 1959) (3x4 cropped).jpg

And also:

File:Fidel Castro (c. 1959).jpg

Yours sincerely, – Howardcorn33 (💬) 17:14, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Trapper Seth Kinman seated in chair with rifle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trapper Seth Kinman seated in chair with rifle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

FM promotion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:All Quiet on the Western Front (1930, sound version).webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:All Quiet on the Western Front (1930, sound version).webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

Tvpuppy (talk) 15:57, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Napalm Sticks to Kids song.flac

Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Napalm Sticks to Kids song.flac has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Napalm Sticks to Kids song.flac

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Fourthords | =Λ= | 19:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Space Needle at World's Fair, 1962.jpg

Latest comment: 25 days ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure what you are asking me in your comment in the new-version upload there. - Jmabel ! talk 00:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel, I was saying I'd be happy to finish the restoration if you wanted. JayCubby (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

What "restoration"? - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jmabel, cleaning up the fairly extensive dust and scratches on the film slide. JayCubby (talk) 01:04, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Because it is archival material from a GLAM, any such work should be uploaded under a distinct file name. - Jmabel ! talk 02:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I will split the file off tomorrow. Thank you. JayCubby (talk) 02:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

Latest comment: 24 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodor Herzl balcony portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Bangkok Skyscraper swimming pool during Myanmar earthquake.webm

Latest comment: 20 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bangkok Skyscraper swimming pool during Myanmar earthquake.webm has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bangkok Skyscraper swimming pool during Myanm…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!